The InfoStride Forum

NEWS and REPORTS => Nigerian News => Topic started by: MrVan on Dec 12, 2012, 09:30 PM

Title: Corruption trial: Alao-Akala has case to answer – Oyo court
Post by: MrVan on Dec 12, 2012, 09:30 PM
Ibadan – Justice Akintunde Boade of the Oyo State High Court sitting in Ibadan on Wednesday  ruled that  a former governor of the state, Otunba Adebayo Alao-Akala, has a case to answer in the corruption trial initiated by the EFCC.

Alao-Akala and two others   were arraigned on an 11-count charge of  conspiracy, illegal award of contracts, obtaining by false presence, acquiring property with money derived from illegal act and concealing the ownership of such property.

Boade held  that the proof of evidence provided before the court against Alao-Akala and the other accused persons was implicating.

He  consequently adjourned the case  till Feb. 11, 2013 for the opening of trial.

Addressing newsmen  after the court session, Mr Mamman Osman, who represented the lead defence counsel,  Mr Lafeef Fagbemi,  rejected the ruling.

"The judge showed great capacity for resilience and was quite accommodating to counsel.

"Within the period he listened to the preliminary objection and gave his ruling, he put in substantial industry.

"That notwithstanding, we do not accept this ruling as a correct position of the  law. Our legal opinion is that the position taken by the judge is erroneous in law.

"However, because we are not the defendants, we would await further instructions  from our clients. We have no initiation, hereafter, except to await further instruction from our clients.

"Nevertheless, we have requested for a true certified copy of the ruling so that we would not be caught unawares  should our clients decide to appeal," he said.

But  EFCC lead counsel, Chief Godwin Obla, said that the judge was correct in law by  upholding the substantive application that the first accused person (Alao-Akala)  was a public officer.

"You will recall that the first accused person  said that he was not a public officer for the purpose of the ICPC Act, but we brought authorities to show that under the constitution, he was and the court so held.

"Issues have been thrown up that require  the accused persons  to be asked questions and to offer explanations.

"On the basis of materials  and the proof of evidence before his Lordship, he was of the view that there are enough materials requiring the accused persons  to offer explanation.

"However, those materials must not be equated with proof  which come later.

"On the basis of these findings, he found their applications to be without merit and he accordingly and appropriately dismissed them," Obla said.

Fagbemi had on July 12  filed an application urging the court to quash the charges brought against the former  governor.

He argued that  the proof of evidence and the preliminary objection submitted by the prosecutor were irregularly placed and were, therefore, not in conformity with the  law.

The defence counsel also said  his clients had no case to answer since the proof of evidence submitted by the prosecution lacked the required essential ingredients.

Alao-Akala was present in court with the two other accused persons.

They are  Sen.  Hosea  Agboola, a former Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy  Affairs in the  Alao-Akala administration and  Femi Babalola, the Chairman of  Pentagon Engineering Services. (NAN)

Vanguard Nigeria