The InfoStride Forum

NEWS and REPORTS => World News => Topic started by: HuffingtonPost on Feb 14, 2013, 04:30 PM

Title: Vote On Obama Pick Delayed Over Controversial Memos
Post by: HuffingtonPost on Feb 14, 2013, 04:30 PM


* Political sparring over Brennan becoming public                

* Feinstein says Brennan will be "capable CIA director"                

* Republicans threaten to put "hold" on nomination     (Adds confirmation of delay, threats from senators to "hold"  nomination)                

By Mark Hosenball                

WASHINGTON, Feb 13 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate Intelligence  Committee will delay a vote on the confirmation of John Brennan  as CIA director at least until the last week in February,  committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein said on Wednesday.                

Democrats on the committee had hoped to hold the vote on  Thursday, following a public hearing last week and a closed-door  hearing on Tuesday at which Brennan testified before the panel.                

However, political issues and procedural rules made a  Thursday vote problematic, said congressional sources, who spoke  on condition of anonymity.                

In a statement late on Wednesday, Feinstein confirmed that  because "members of the committee have the ability to object to  a vote on the nomination of Mr. Brennan to be the CIA director  until after Thursday ... the vote will be delayed."                

She did not specify a date for the vote. But it cannot be  held next week because Congress is in recess.                

Feinstein said she hoped "to schedule a vote on his  nomination as soon as possible after the upcoming recess." She  added that Brennan "had made clear in two confirmation hearings  that he will be a strong and capable CIA director."                

Political sparring over the nomination, which was muted at  Brennan's public confirmation hearing last week, now has started  to emerge in public.                

On Wednesday, Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a  favorite of the Tea Party movement, announced he was prepared to  put a "hold" on Brennan's nomination "until Mr. Brennan openly  responds" to questions about the administration's policy on the  use of armed drones to attack U.S. citizens.                

Under Senate rules an individual Senator can place a  personal "hold" on nominations heading for the Senate floor, but  such moves can be over-ridden in certain circumstances.                

Another Republican senator, Lindsey Graham of South  Carolina, has also threatened to hold Brennan's nomination  unless the administration responds more fully to questions about  its handling of the September 2012 attack by militants on U.S.  installations in Benghazi, Libya.                                

PRESSURE FOR MORE DOCUMENTS                

While it is still too early to determine how many, if any,  Republicans might be willing to support "holds" or a filibuster  against a Senate floor vote on Brennan, congressional aides said  both Democrats and Republicans were using the latest delays to  pressure the White House to release sensitive papers to the  committee.                

Democrats want the White House to give them access to more  documents, prepared by the Justice Department's Office of Legal  Counsel, outlining legal justifications and operational rules  for drone strikes targeted against militants, including suspects  who are American citizens. Paul appears to be seeking related  information.                

Before last week's hearing, the White House gave committee  members tightly restricted access to two classified legal  opinions on drone strikes.                

But in a statement on Wednesday, Feinstein said the  committee was pressing for disclosure of seven more opinions,  plus "any other relevant documents."                

Senators also want the administration to allow committee  staffers and not just lawmakers to read the documents, she said.                

Committee Republicans have indicated they will press the  White House to disclose a full written record outlining the  evolution of "talking points" on the Benghazi attacks.                

Administration critics say the talking points misleadingly  played down early suspicions that Islamic militants were behind  the attacks.                

Congressional sources said the administration initially had  promised to turn over the records, but later backed off,  asserting that the documents were "deliberative" and thus exempt  from disclosure.                

Committee rules say that votes should not be held until at  least 48 hours after an official transcript is produced of  confirmation hearings.                

Based on this technicality, two sources said, there was a  concern that the transcript of Tuesday's closed-door hearing  with Brennan would not be completed in time for a vote on his  nomination Thursday.                

The White House declined to comment.     (Editing by Xavier Briand and Mohammad Zargham)

Via: HuffingtonPost