The InfoStride Forum

NEWS and REPORTS => World News => Topic started by: HuffingtonPost on Jun 11, 2013, 07:31 PM

Title: Same-intercourse Marriage Prohibition Bill In Nigeria – Any Human Rights Implications?
Post by: HuffingtonPost on Jun 11, 2013, 07:31 PM
A same-intercourse union is known to be a intercourseual relationship between people of the same intercourse; namely, between two or more males or two or more females. This relationship often described as unnatural and amongst the Christian and Islamic faiths in Nigeria is general not accepted. Without any intentions of making an ideological or philosophical argument on the issue of the morality of this kind of relationship, I would like to explore the human rights implications of passing of the Same-intercourse Marriage Prohibition Bill in Nigeria on 31 May 2013.

The new Bill refutes any benefits that may accrue to a marriage and restates that such a marriage will not be recognised, even when contracted outside Nigeria. It further outlaws the gathering of people of the same-intercourse and provides in very wide terms "directly or indirectly" liability for any person or group that is involved in a same intercourse relationship. It further stipulates a minimum period of 10 years imprisonment for direct or indirect involvement in issues concerning the rights of people of the same-intercourse. In enacting the Bill, the House of Assembly of Nigeria propose a $40million internet monitoring project to clamp down on people involved in same-intercourse unions.

HuffingtonPost