The InfoStride Forum

TECHNOLOGY => Computing and Internet => Topic started by: ReadWrite on Jul 25, 2013, 07:31 PM

Title: Why Google Reader Was Left For Dead
Post by: ReadWrite on Jul 25, 2013, 07:31 PM
  (http://readwrite.com/files/fields/LarryPage_Google.jpg)  

The demise of Google Reader (http://readwrite.com/2013/03/14/why-we-mourn-google-reader-and-why-it-matters) was met with much wailing and gnashing of teeth among its loyal fans, many of whom voiced a common complaint: Why did the news reader they depended upon have to die?

(See also: How To Make News Readers Work For You (http://readwrite.com/2013/07/01/how-to-make-news-readers-work-for-you))

Turns out that you can blame Larry Page. As BuzzFeed's Matt Lynley reports, Page and his inner circle didn't consider Reader "an important strategic priority (http://www.buzzfeed.com/mattlynley/google-reader-died-because-no-one-would-run-it)." As a result, no one in Google wanted to run the unit, knowing that doing so wouldn't gain them any attention from Page and his inner circle.

 

ReadWrite