The InfoStride Forum

NEWS and REPORTS => World News => Topic started by: THP on Aug 18, 2011, 03:02 PM

Title: What to Expect From a President Perry on the Environment? Some Texas-sized Clues
Post by: THP on Aug 18, 2011, 03:02 PM
      By Jim Morris and Evan Bush, iWatch News    

What would President Rick Perry's environmental agenda look like?

For clues, one need only examine Perry's record as governor of Texas, where the chairman of the state environmental agency writes vitriolic letters to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and questions the science behind climate change.

Bryan Shaw  (http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/about/organization/shaw_bio.html), a 2007 Perry appointee to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality who became the agency's chairman in 2009, opined in a  guest column  (http://www.elpasotimes.com/opinion/ci_18491942) in the El Paso Times last month that a new EPA rule designed to reduce cross-state air pollution from coal-fired power plants was in fact "aimed at cutting Texas jobs, cutting Texas economic growth, increasing Texas energy costs, and harming Texas energy security."

Like iWatch News' Environment coverage on Facebook and get the latest news instantly.      FACT CHECK: Perry exaggerates statistics on oil imports, federal debt (http://www.iwatchnews.org/2011/08/15/5797/fact-check-perry-exaggerates-statistics-oil-imports-federal-debt)        By FactCheck.Org      August 15, 2011              Rick Perry has made false or exaggerated claims on U.S. oil imports, the federal debt, Social Security and the federal health care law.         Over the Limit (http://www.iwatchnews.org/2008/06/11/5817/over-limit)        By Joaquin Sapien      June 11, 2008              Rusk County, TEXAS -- A gentle twilight pink stretches across the sky, touching the waters of Martin Creek Lake. The still air, smelling only of East Texas pines, brings the faint sounds of wildlife in the surrounding woods. Smog and traffic seem much further away than the 145-mile drive to Dallas.               The column closely followed a statement by Perry himself, who called the rule "another example of heavy-handed and misguided action from Washington, D.C."

Perry's gubernatorial campaign received more than $5 million in contributions from energy companies and their employees during the 2009-2010 election cycle, according to data compiled by the nonpartisan  National Institute on Money in State Politics  (http://www.followthemoney.org/). Among Perry's largest contributors during the cycle: Houston oilmen  Jeffrey Hildebrand  (http://www.forbes.com/profile/jeffrey-hildebrand) and  Gary Petersen  (http://people.forbes.com/profile/gary-r-petersen/31080) , and  Valero Energy Corp  (http://www.valero.com/default.aspx). Oil and gas companies consistently are among the state's biggest polluters.

Perry recently  told the Christian Broadcast Network  (http://blogs.cbn.com/beltwaybuzz/archive/2011/08/05/rick-perry-i-pray-for-the-president-everyday.aspx) that he prays for President Obama every day, asking in particular that "his EPA back down these regulations that are causing businesses to hesitate to spend money."

Shaw, in June 30  testimony (http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=eedf7d18-3b2f-4a1c-b267-713eca4fc1cd) before the a Senate clean air and nuclear safety subcommittee, attacked another EPA rule meant to limit emissions of mercury and other toxic compounds from coal- and oil-fired power plants. Shaw maintained, among other things, that "any health benefits [from the rule] would be insubstantial compared to the cost of regulation" and expressed concern that "the reliability of the Texas electrical power system will be severely compromised."

And in a  testy letter  (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/232825-letter-from-abbott-shaw-to-epa.html) to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson and Regional Administrator Al Armendariz a year ago, Shaw and Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said they would defy EPA regulations - stemming from a 2006  U.S. Supreme Court decision  (http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-1120.pdf),  Massachusetts v. EPA - requiring Texas to begin issuing permits for greenhouse gas emissions from industrial sources.

Shaw declined Wednesday, through a spokeswoman at the agency he chairs, to be interviewed by  iWatch News  (http://www.iwatchnews.org/).  Catherine Frazier, a spokeswoman in the governor's office, said "the governor is proud of [Shaw's] leadership and expects he will put Texas's interests at the top of his decision-making."

Frazier said that Perry, like Shaw, finds the science linking human activities to climate change to be "very questionable." The EPA, she said, "continues to impose burdensome, job-killing mandates on Texas and the governor believes there needs to be a balanced approach to protecting jobs and protecting the environment. Texas has created a model for how to accomplish that goal."

Environmental activists in Texas say they grew worried about Shaw when he  disclosed (http://texasclimatenews.org/wp/?p=54) during his 2009  confirmation hearing  (http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/minutes/html/C5722009041513001.HTM) that he didn't believe the science on climate change was "fully settled." Continue this story and read more investigations at iWatch News (http://www.iwatchnews.org/2011/08/18/5816/what-expect-president-perry-environment-some-texas-sized-clues)More... (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-center-for-public-integrity/what-to-expect-from-a-pre_b_930228.html)

Huffington Post