The 2024-2026 Medium Term Expenditure Framework and Fiscal Strategy Paper (MTEF/FSP) received the nod from the House of Representatives on Tuesday, marking a significant step in shaping Nigeria’s economic trajectory. In this pivotal document, a borrowing plan of N7.8 trillion for 2024 emerged as a cornerstone of the nation’s financial strategy.
Delving into the specifics, the House set benchmark oil prices for the years 2024, 2025, and 2026 at $73.96, $73.76, and $69.90 per barrel, respectively. This deliberate calibration is indicative of a meticulous approach to forecasting in the volatile global oil market. Correspondingly, daily crude oil production levels were pegged at 1.78 Mbps, 1.80 Mbps, and 1.81 Mbps for the same period, reflecting a keen awareness of the dynamic nature of the energy sector.
The executive’s proposed exchange rates for the fiscal years 2024–2026 were N700, N665.61, and N669.79 to USD$1. These rates, pivotal in determining the value of the Naira against the dollar, found concurrence in the deliberations of the lower house. Such alignment ensures a unified vision between the legislative and executive branches, fostering stability and coherence in economic planning.
In addressing the specter of inflation, the House of Representatives proposed rates of 21.40% for 2024, 20.30% for 2025, and 18.60% for 2026. These figures, while projecting a gradual decline, underscore the challenges in maintaining price stability and will undoubtedly factor into broader monetary policy considerations. Concurrently, the lower chamber suggested GDP growth rates of 3.76%, 4.22%, and 4.78% for the respective years, reflecting an optimistic outlook on economic expansion.
Zooming in on the key parameters for 2024, the MTEF/FSP document delineated a comprehensive framework. The Federal Government’s recommended spending stood at N26 trillion, with a substantial N16.9 trillion generated through retained revenue. Against this backdrop, a budget deficit of N9 trillion was envisaged, necessitating a strategic balance between fiscal prudence and the imperative of public spending.
A significant component of the financial strategy was the earmarked N7.8 trillion in new borrowings. This borrowing plan, while indicative of the government’s intent to mobilize resources for developmental projects, also raises questions about the sustainability and impact of the burgeoning national debt.
Within this financial tapestry, statutory transfers amounted to N1.3 trillion, reflecting the government’s commitment to fulfilling its obligatory financial obligations. Meanwhile, the projected debt service cost of N8.2 trillion underscored the importance of managing and mitigating the burden of servicing Nigeria’s debt, a critical aspect of sustainable fiscal policy.
Further unraveling the intricate threads, the sinking fund was allocated N243.6 billion, earmarked to meet financial obligations and address contingencies. Pension, gratuity, and retiree benefits claimed N1.27 trillion, emphasizing the government’s commitment to its workforce and retirees.
In dissecting the expenditure composition, the total recurrent (non-debt) expenditure was estimated at N10.2 trillion. Personnel costs (MDAs) accounted for N4.49 trillion, reflecting the financial commitment to the public workforce. Capital expenditure (exclusive of transfers) amounted to N5.9 trillion, indicative of the government’s dedication to infrastructural development and economic growth.
Beyond the core financial deliberations, the House’s committees on debt management, loans, and finance took a bold stance on the restructuring of the Nigerian Postal Service (NIPOST). Proposing the winding up and deregistration of irregular and unlawful subsidiaries, this move aligns with the imperative of streamlining and optimizing public enterprises for efficiency and fiscal responsibility.
A notable dimension of the House’s decision-making was the call for an investigation into the potential mismanagement of the NIPOST restructuring and recapitalization plan. The allocation of N10 billion by the Ministry of Finance for this initiative prompted scrutiny, signaling the legislature’s commitment to transparency and accountability in financial matters.
In a broader stroke, the House mandated that tax waivers should only be issued when directly linked to non-governmental or non-profit organizations. Additionally, a comprehensive investigation into all tax waivers granted since 2015 was proposed, underscoring the legislature’s intent to scrutinize and evaluate fiscal incentives and exemptions.
As Infostride News brings these intricate details to light, the nation watches with anticipation as the economic roadmap for 2024-2026 takes shape. The House of Representatives, in steering the course of fiscal policy, grapples with the delicate balance of addressing immediate challenges while laying the groundwork for sustainable economic growth. The decisions made within the hallowed chambers reverberate through the corridors of power, influencing the trajectory of Nigeria’s economic journey in the years to come.
Support InfoStride News' Credible Journalism: Only credible journalism can guarantee a fair, accountable and transparent society, including democracy and government. It involves a lot of efforts and money. We need your support. Click here to Donate