Tinubu’s Government on Course to Surpass Buhari’s Failures, Lukman Warns

Salihu Lukman, former National Vice Chairman, North-West, of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has issued a stark warning regarding the trajectory of Nigeria’s current administration under President Bola Tinubu.

In a recent statement, Lukman expressed deep concern that Tinubu’s governance may ultimately prove more detrimental than that of his predecessor, former President Muhammadu Buhari.

Lukman’s critique of the Tinubu administration is rooted in what he perceives as a worsening state of governance in Nigeria.

Reflecting on the past, he lamented that Buhari’s presidency, which many had hoped would mark a significant improvement in leadership, ultimately fell short of public expectations.

In his assessment, Buhari’s administration was even less effective than that of his predecessor, Goodluck Jonathan.

Lukman’s disappointment is palpable, particularly given the high hopes that accompanied Buhari’s ascent to power.

He was widely regarded as a leader who would bring about significant positive change, especially in areas such as security, economic stability, and anti-corruption efforts.

However, Lukman argues that Buhari’s performance was a far cry from what was promised, leading to widespread disenchantment among Nigerians.

In his statement, Lukman drew a concerning parallel between the current administration and its predecessors, suggesting that the trend of declining governance quality is likely to continue.

He noted that if the situation under Tinubu continues to deteriorate, Nigeria could find itself in an even more precarious position by the time the next presidential election rolls around in 2027.

Lukman’s warning extends beyond a mere critique of Tinubu’s administration; it serves as a broader commentary on the cyclical nature of governance in Nigeria.

He expressed fears that if the APC is defeated in the 2027 elections, there is no guarantee that the new government will be any better.

In fact, he suggested that the worsening trend in leadership might result in an administration that is even less effective than Tinubu’s.

He said, “As Nigerians, we are witnesses of how governments at all levels progressively become worse.

With all the confidence many of us had in former President Muhammadu Buhari, arguably his performance failed to meet public expectations, perhaps worse than former President Goodluck Jonathan.

Certainly, President Asiwaju Tinubu is on track of becoming worse than former President Buhari.”

Lukman’s concerns are rooted in the observation that each successive government appears to fall short of its predecessor, a trend that has left many Nigerians disillusioned with the political process.

He suggested that this decline in governance quality is not merely a result of individual leadership failures but is indicative of a deeper systemic issue within Nigeria’s political landscape.

Lukman’s criticism of Tinubu’s administration is particularly significant given his position within the APC and his involvement in the party’s leadership.

His statement highlights the growing dissatisfaction within the party and raises questions about the direction in which the country is heading under Tinubu’s leadership.

Under Tinubu’s administration, Nigeria continues to grapple with numerous challenges, including economic instability, insecurity, and widespread corruption.

These issues, which were also prevalent during Buhari’s tenure, have shown little sign of improvement, leading many to question the effectiveness of the current government.

Lukman’s warning serves as a reminder that the expectations placed on Tinubu’s government were high, particularly given his long-standing involvement in Nigerian politics and his reputation as a seasoned politician.

However, as Lukman points out, these expectations are not being met, and the country is at risk of sliding further into a state of disarray.

Lukman’s statement is not just a critique but a call to action for both the APC and the wider Nigerian political class.

He urges a reflection on the current state of governance and a commitment to reversing the downward spiral that has characterised Nigerian leadership in recent years.

His concerns also highlight the importance of holding leaders accountable and ensuring that those in power are committed to addressing the country’s pressing issues.

Without significant reform, Lukman fears that the cycle of diminishing leadership will continue, leaving Nigeria in a state of perpetual decline.

As the country looks towards the 2027 elections, Lukman’s warning serves as a sobering reminder of the challenges ahead.

It underscores the need for a renewed focus on good governance, transparency, and accountability, not just within the APC but across the entire political spectrum.

Only by addressing these issues can Nigeria hope to break the cycle of declining leadership and chart a course towards a more prosperous and stable future.