The Federal Government has stood firm in its decision to implement a tariff hike, despite growing resistance from the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) and numerous consumer advocacy groups. Critics argue that the increase will impose undue hardship on citizens already grappling with economic difficulties.
SERAP has expressed its readiness to take legal action against the government, citing a lack of transparency and insufficient public consultation in the decision-making process. According to SERAP, the hike violates fundamental human rights by further marginalizing economically vulnerable populations.
Subscribers, too, have voiced their dissatisfaction, with many taking to social media and other platforms to demand a reversal of the increase. They argue that the tariff adjustment is unjustified, given the quality of service they currently receive.

In defense, the government maintains that the hike is necessary to sustain and improve infrastructure, particularly in sectors like energy and telecommunications. Officials claim the move is a step toward aligning prices with economic realities and ensuring long-term service delivery.
As the standoff continues, experts predict that this controversy could set a precedent for how public grievances against government policies are handled in the future. With legal proceedings looming, the outcome may significantly influence future tariff-related decisions.
Support InfoStride News' Credible Journalism: Only credible journalism can guarantee a fair, accountable and transparent society, including democracy and government. It involves a lot of efforts and money. We need your support. Click here to Donate